NORTHSET
Proof-of-Pass Receipt
Receipt ID M-176
ISSUE / WORKThrow helpful error when `number` option is invalid · PR #186
CONTRIBUTOR SELF-RUN — NOT MAINTAINER VERIFICATION
RUN→
01 / TECHNICAL RESULT
Technical result
declared commands passed
Recorded on the named code in the named execution environment. The evidence annex carries the exact scope.
- Upstream
- OPENmutable external state
- Attempts
- 2 totalcurrent
M-176· #2 - Cost record
- PARTIALunpriced
02 / RECORDED WORK SEQUENCE
Northset Proofline
Every task-bound attempt is shown in recorded order. Anatomy geometry follows each non-null elapsed duration’s share; labels retain exact recorded time.
- ATTEMPT 1
M-175FAILED INFRA TERMINALinfrastructure - ATTEMPT 2
M-176READY
ATTEMPT 2 / EXECUTION ANATOMY
03 / ECONOMIC NARRATIVE
Economic identity
Observed sponsorship, authorization, scope, transfer, and outcome. No estimates or inferred value.
01 / MANDATE
Sponsored and authorized
The recorded mandate names both its sponsor and initiative, with authorization tied to a named approver and approval time.
02 / WORK
Demand became scoped work
An external issue invitation became a stable task and a recorded code-and-test scope, without treating scope as a measure of value.
03 / EXTERNAL OUTCOME
Transfer and upstream state
The recorded maintainer transfer and its contingency are separate from upstream state, which remains a mutable external observation.
04 / COST COMPLETENESS
Known, unknown, and unpriced
Known: maintainer payment was none. A known zero external transfer is not a zero total cost.
Missing or unpriced components
- model inference
- actual host compute
- human review
- shared tooling
No complete total is recorded; see the missing or unpriced component record above.
Evidence annexEconomic · technical · provenance · limitations
01Economic evidence
Lineage, usage, caps, outcome, and cost provenance
Economic evidence
Lineage, usage, caps, outcome, and cost provenanceAttempt lineage
M-175attempt 1 · FAILED INFRA TERMINAL · infrastructureM-176attempt 2 · READY
Recorded usage
- requested reviewer model
- gpt-5.6-sol
- actual reviewer model
- not captured
- requested author model
- gpt-5.6-sol
- actual author model
- not captured
- networked setup phase
- 7.9s
- install-only duration
- not captured
- declared commands
- 1.4s
- unclassified executor time
- 4s
- CPU time
- not captured
- peak RSS
- not captured
Configured resource envelope
- CPU cap
- 2
- memory cap
- 4096 MB
- PID cap
- 512
- command wall cap
- 1800s
- output cap / stream
- 2000000 bytes
Configured limits are an envelope, not observed consumption.
Cost lines
- maintainer paymentobserved quantity unpriced · 0 external transfer · amount unavailable
Cost status: partial. Values without source-backed quantities and rates remain null.
Outcome facts
- technical checks passed
- true
- PR opened
- true
- CI
- pending
- merged
- false
- accepted as submitted
- not established
- external cycle time
- not captured
- released
- not observed
- deployed
- not observed
- business result
- not observed
02Technical evidence
Code, environment, exact commands, patch, and outputs
Technical evidence
Code, environment, exact commands, patch, and outputsProject
Work
Throw helpful error when `number` option is invalid · PR #186
Verification execution
runtime: northset-oss executor v1
human operator: aeziz
Code
- base
64182013ac77df26d96dce3ba49a008015a9a600- recorded patch commit
dad4d74f7c11eb20d8783d43caa4b29b850bd320
declared metadata; not execution-bound- patch diff SHA-256
sha256:c94ba3d9a8d05706f251446af82c90bf1ec3c46b18a16a7fe88c70797b460b05
bound to executed patch bytes
Environment
- image reference
- node@sha256:40ad9f3064e67d6860b4bc3fe1880b2953934fd6320ada990e45fe0efa6badd7
- repository digest
node@sha256:40ad9f3064e67d6860b4bc3fe1880b2953934fd6320ada990e45fe0efa6badd7- immutable image ID
sha256:6ed6ff875e9714bb845b850b08f3ad231ccbb5848812647bcf11acdd4bd1d2f8- platform
- linux/arm64
- network
- phaseA:bridge,phaseB:none
Declared checks
Execution summary
1/1 declared command returned exit 0 in the recorded environment
./node_modules/.bin/ava test/constructor.test.jsexit 0 · 1.4s
run wall (derived from recorded timestamps) 13.3s
PASS — 1/1 declared command
Every command listed returned exit 0 in the declared environment. Only the listed commands are in scope. Unlisted test, lint, typecheck, build, coverage, compiler, full-suite, and CI gates are not implied or recorded.
Public scope interpretation
The receipt proves the focused constructor regression only; maintainer review, CI, and merge remain independent decisions.
Committed patch.diff
diff --git a/index.js b/index.js
index c5c3d87489384a63218a5b6ba6fa52f301bf9bf5..4399473395ceb23d048e26f704b610f186f391c9 100644
--- a/index.js
+++ b/index.js
@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ export default class GitHubProject {
constructor(options) {
const { owner, number, fields = {} } = options;
+ if (Number.isNaN(number)) {
+ throw new TypeError("The number option must be a valid number");
+ }
+
// set octokit either from `options.octokit` or `options.token`
const octokit =
"token" in options
diff --git a/test/constructor.test.js b/test/constructor.test.js
index 6378b53c7d2b796ca018d131eef379644a219991..f34028279931a7defc3356fa4332ec1b48a4a74e 100644
--- a/test/constructor.test.js
+++ b/test/constructor.test.js
@@ -50,3 +50,15 @@ test("constructor with token", (t) => {
t.true(project.octokit instanceof Octokit);
});
+
+test("rejects NaN as the number option", (t) => {
+ t.throws(
+ () =>
+ new GitHubProject({
+ owner: "owner",
+ number: NaN,
+ octokit: new Octokit(),
+ }),
+ { message: "The number option must be a valid number" },
+ );
+});
Redacted stdout
=== cmd 1: ./node_modules/.bin/ava test/constructor.test.js ===
✔ constructor
✔ constructor with custom fields
✔ constructor with token
✔ rejects NaN as the number option
─
4 tests passed
Redacted stderr
=== cmd 1: ./node_modules/.bin/ava test/constructor.test.js ===
03Provenance & limitations
Bundle identity, attestation, verification, and claims boundary
Provenance & limitations
Bundle identity, attestation, verification, and claims boundaryRecord details
- payment
- none · not merge-contingent
- redactions
- none recorded
- Bundle contents digest
sha256:4336cf789521039384d0a61c7ad4b6a3b8c644aa503a3d564a40ae5eace87f5a- Signed asset SHA-256
sha256:f208b5838773e12407f556a788daa48194216ead0217f4dcef0cb8b76c6a1380- Signed provenance recorded
- verified 2026-07-16T22:49:26.547Z
NOT INCLUDED
- Does not prove code quality
- Does not prove security
- Contributor self-run record of Northset's own contribution; not the maintainer's verification.
- The receipt proves the focused constructor regression only; maintainer review, CI, and merge remain independent decisions.
Signed bundle
Verify this receipt
gh attestation verify run-record-M-176-4336cf789521.tar.gz --repo northset-oss/verification-pilot --signer-workflow northset-oss/verification-pilot/.github/workflows/attest-bundle.ymlAttestation confirms that Northset's signing workflow produced this exact bundle. The signer does not witness the recorded run, and verification does not turn it into maintainer verification.
QR → receipt page